Pin Compatible

Technical discussions around xCORE processors (e.g. xcore-200 & xcore.ai).
User avatar
AtomSoft
XCore Addict
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:02 pm
Contact:

Pin Compatible

Post by AtomSoft »

Just wondering... is the

XS1-L8A-64-TQ128-C5

PIN COMPATIBLE WITH

XS1-L01A-TQ128-C5-THS


Just asking as i dont feel like making a new Eagle Part and i have had a headache for hours now...

These seem to be just about the same chip probably just a updated rev marked as a new chip :)


User avatar
AtomSoft
XCore Addict
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:02 pm
Contact:

Post by AtomSoft »

Nope they arent... nevermind :)
User avatar
infiniteimprobability
XCore Legend
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 10:08 am
Contact:

Post by infiniteimprobability »

eh? They should be! L01A = L8A and the package is the same.

http://media.digikey.com/pdf/PCNs/XMOS/ ... Change.pdf
User avatar
AtomSoft
XCore Addict
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:02 pm
Contact:

Post by AtomSoft »

yeah but they arent and that kind of sucks. Thanks for the PDF... was looking for it before but its not usefull now :(
User avatar
segher
XCore Expert
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:31 am
Contact:

Post by segher »

What makes you think those are different chips, with
different pinouts?
User avatar
Ross
XCore Expert
Posts: 962
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:20 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Post by Ross »

AtomSoft wrote:yeah but they arent and that kind of sucks
They are. Please point us to where you find different?
User avatar
AtomSoft
XCore Addict
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:02 pm
Contact:

Post by AtomSoft »

Take a look, Pin 24 for ex...
Attachments
Clipboard02.jpg
(72.56 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Clipboard02.jpg
(72.56 KiB) Not downloaded yet
User avatar
Bianco
XCore Expert
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Bianco »

They are all related to the PCU, interesting :)
User avatar
AtomSoft
XCore Addict
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:02 pm
Contact:

Post by AtomSoft »

So did i find a datasheet error or is this the actual part being different... or am i just going nuts? :)
User avatar
segher
XCore Expert
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:31 am
Contact:

Post by segher »

The new datasheet is the same as the old for the common
case where you do not wire up the PCU, as far as I see. Why
was it quietly removed from the datasheet? My guess is it
didn't really work.

[Edit] It's in the revision history, actually; no explanation given.
Post Reply