Search found 21 matches
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:14 am
- Forum: XMOS Devices
- Topic: Why won't DFU erase M25PE20
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12949
Re: Why won't DFU erase M25PE20
Hi, Ross We are working well both on xflash burner and DFU with the flash IC: AT25DF041A And manufacturer told us AT25 S F041A is the new one we should use because AT25DF041A is EOL. We change the device ID in SPI-SPEC file with xflash, and we could burn it successfully now. But we have trouble with...
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:14 am
- Forum: XMOS Devices
- Topic: Why won't DFU erase M25PE20
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12949
Re: Why won't DFU erase M25PE20
Hi, Ross We are working well both on xflash burner and DFU with the flash IC: AT25DF041A And manufacturer told us AT25 S F041A is the new one we should use because AT25DF041A is EOL. We change the device ID in SPI-SPEC file with xflash, and we could burn it successfully now. But we have trouble with...
- Thu Feb 20, 2014 12:35 am
- Forum: XMOS Devices
- Topic: Why won't DFU erase M25PE20
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12949
Re: Why won't DFU erase M25PE20
Similar situation here... Environment: XMOS device: XS1-SU8 Flash device: AT25DF041A * in customdefines.h #define DFU_FLASH_DEVICE FL_DEVICE_ATMEL_AT25DF041A * Tool: 13.0.1 * Command line to program the flash... xflash --boot-partition-size 0x20000 Geek_Out_1V0_1.xe * Command line to generate upgrad...
- Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:28 am
- Forum: Projects
- Topic: Using XMOS in hi-end DAC mod
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4331
Re: Using XMOS in hi-end DAC mod
Can be slaved or master... Can send out I2S signal by simple pin list or RJ45 connectors.
- Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:26 am
- Forum: Latest news
- Topic: New Version of Dev Tools with Graphical Run-Time Analyzer
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11470
Re: New Version of Dev Tools with Graphical Run-Time Analyzer
:D It looks very cool! I will try it out...
The highest of sampling frequency is?
The highest of sampling frequency is?
- Sun Feb 06, 2011 4:53 pm
- Forum: Other XMOS Development Kits
- Topic: Any alternates for SMSC USB3318?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 14016
Re: Any alternates for SMSC USB3318?
Yes, just dropped it in with the appropriate circuit changes and package change and it works. The USB3320 will also work but that still requires the 1.8V regulator. Production pricing on all 3 parts are extremely close so it was a "no brainer" to design in the USB3340 other than risk runn...
- Sun Feb 06, 2011 4:48 pm
- Forum: Other Applications
- Topic: XMOS USB Audio 2.0 Reference Design Build 3.xx
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16730
Re: XMOS USB Audio 2.0 Reference Design Build 3.01
Well... just got sometime to review the V3.02 code... Several new things there (most of them are not new function) 1. Now they unify the L1 & L2 firmware code quite a lot... (but it generate a lot of useless code for L1 reference design like MIXER, PLL, 18 channel Inputs, Clock generation from S...
- Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:27 pm
- Forum: Projects
- Topic: Using XMOS in hi-end DAC mod
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4331
Re: Using XMOS in hi-end DAC mod
But it seems hard to do a module can fit in ALL kinds of DAC chips... what DAC chip do you plan to use?
- Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:27 pm
- Forum: Projects
- Topic: Using XMOS in hi-end DAC mod
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4331
Re: Using XMOS in hi-end DAC mod
But it seems hard to do a module can fit in ALL kinds of DAC chips... what DAC chip do you plan to use?
- Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:00 pm
- Forum: Other Applications
- Topic: XMOS USB Audio 2.0 Reference Design Build 3.xx
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16730
Re: XMOS USB Audio 2.0 Reference Design Build 3.01
They add a lot of software function, especially in L2 reference board.
Since I have spent q lot of time of L1/L2 reference code. I think I can quickly sort out the key difference and improvement.
Cheers,
:D
Since I have spent q lot of time of L1/L2 reference code. I think I can quickly sort out the key difference and improvement.
Cheers,
:D