40pin DIP Module Using XS1-L1-48

Technical discussions around xCORE processors (e.g. xcore-200 & xcore.ai).
User avatar
Folknology
XCore Legend
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Post by Folknology »

I'm all for KISS and low cost in the 40 pin DIP Module so external JTAG.

regards
Al


User avatar
jonathan
Respected Member
Posts: 377
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:07 pm

Post by jonathan »

Omer wrote:
Corin wrote:Hence, would anybody be interested in bigger DIP type modules (e.g. 64-pin with more I/O)?
A larger (yet still compact) module with an L2 (or even a G4!), some SRAM, Ethernet and/or USB connectivity would be awesome (something along the lines of this module, preferably with a sensible I/O connector). IMO it doesn't make much sense to have an L1 on a bigger DIP module.

A module like this would simplify the design process for utilising multi-core XMOS devices in custom designs quite significantly.
This raised to the power this.
Image
User avatar
Folknology
XCore Legend
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Post by Folknology »

For L2/G4 using a dimm module rather than DIP prob makes sense

regards
Al
User avatar
lilltroll
XCore Expert
Posts: 956
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:53 am
Location: Sweden, Eskilstuna

Post by lilltroll »

For "larger" chips I would vote for a connectivity that can be used in small series like the one below, where the opposite connectivity can be placed by a production robot.

http://www.logicpd.com/products/system- ... orpedo-som

DIP is nice for bredboards.
Probably not the most confused programmer anymore on the XCORE forum.
User avatar
Omer
Member++
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:11 pm

Post by Omer »

Folknology wrote:For L2/G4 using a dimm module rather than DIP prob makes sense
Image

Ditto! :)
DanB
Experienced Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:13 am

Post by DanB »

Omer wrote:
Folknology wrote:For L2/G4 using a dimm module rather than DIP prob makes sense
Image

Ditto! :)
I wonder if at this point we've reaching an overlap with the slices?
User avatar
lilltroll
XCore Expert
Posts: 956
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:53 am
Location: Sweden, Eskilstuna

Post by lilltroll »

DIMM has at least 2 advantages.
You only need plating on the DIMM boards.
It is possible to solder the DIMM socket only by hand with an iron to a 2 layer board.
Probably not the most confused programmer anymore on the XCORE forum.
User avatar
Folknology
XCore Legend
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Post by Folknology »

One could also design boards to house more than a single L2/G4 Dimm for more advanced requirements which is another advantage, its also very compact.

regards
Al
User avatar
Interactive_Matter
XCore Addict
Posts: 216
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:26 am

Post by Interactive_Matter »

Yes, DIM sounds great for more output pins. Still want a super easy 40 pin DIP ;)

And yes I als think it has relevance for the slice kit too (will the slice kit use DIM too? is the LC2 Dim variant just the heart of the slice kit and the slice kit jsut a breakout backplane?).
User avatar
Folknology
XCore Legend
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Post by Folknology »

The advantage of an L2/G4 dimm is it deals with a lot of the hard stuff like tricky package placement, the PITA stuff like multiple supply and monitoring plus boot flash. It offers full I/O for your specific application = maximum flexibility

It is also more cost effective for Xmos as the dimm has no separate connectors just gold fingers and can be built fully in a volume pick and place, thus making it lower cost for everyone.

Xmos should offer both 40P L1 DIP and L2 /G4 Dimms IMHO

regards
Al