X
RSS YouTube LinkedIn Twitter XCore IRC

Search




Post new topic Reply to topic   [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:58 pm 
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:23 pm
Posts: 108
Microcontroller? Microprocessor? Multicore processor?

Considering it's so versatile / powerful, I have a hard time calling it a microconroller... Just wondering what everyone else thinks :-)

-Yvo


Top
Offline Profile View all posts by this user  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:19 am 
User avatar
Experienced Member
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:32 pm
Posts: 69
i gave this topic some serious thought and i would call it a microcontroller because it has everything it needs to function as an independent system. as for being powerful, there are ARM chips that are also powerful but are still classified as microcontrollers as they too can function on their own.

the hardware threading and multiple cores are features but like multicore cpus, they are still classified as microprocessors. to include the threading, i would call it a threadcontroller. however, i wouldnt say it has multiple cores, i would say it has networked cores because multicore processors cant really communicate with each other. however, IBM described their design as being a cell processor. to include all the features, i would call it a cell threadcontroller.

however, it's still a microcontroller.


Top
Offline Profile View all posts by this user  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic   [ 2 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



Search for:
Jump to: