Minimal footprint for xtag-3

Technical questions regarding the xTIMEcomposer, xSOFTip Explorer and Programming with XMOS.
jorsc
Member++
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 1:39 pm

Minimal footprint for xtag-3

Post by jorsc »

Up until now I've just used reference designs with "standard" 2x10 pin IDC and connected xtag-3 directly to the board for factory (xflash) programming. It worked well.
However for an upcoming design I'm looking to make a small PCB and the IDC connector is too big. What would be a minimal number of pins (and which ones) needed on the board to connect xtag-3 (through converter cable) and use xflash (i.e. skip debug etc)?


RitchRock
XCore Addict
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:25 pm

Post by RitchRock »

I use the Tag-Connect cables with a little adapter PCB and 3D printed enclosure. The footprint is small on the target board and requires no header.

Image
User avatar
akp
XCore Expert
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 11:47 pm

Post by akp »

RitchRock, do you have some quantity of the adapter board? You know, that we could order from you. And then I'd need the pinout you use for the Tag Connect, too, of course.
RitchRock
XCore Addict
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:25 pm

Post by RitchRock »

I only have a handful of un-stuffed board left, so I want to keep those for future use. I recommend you just order up some from JLPCB - very cheap and from my experience, when you select the DHL option, you'll have your board in about a week in the USA. I've ordered dozens of board there and never had a problem. Also, there is a really fun factory tour on YouTube.

Attached are all the files you would need.

For the Tag-Connect part, there is an option to buy a cable with little legs that clip into your board or without these legs. No legs = good for quickly programming lots of board; with legs = good for leaving hooked up while coding.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
jorsc
Member++
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 1:39 pm

Post by jorsc »

Thanks for sharing. Looks really interesting.
I also found this https://katalog.we-online.de/em/datashe ... 672012.pdf. Seems like an alternative to Tag-Connect. The Wurth connector is 2.54mm instead of 1.27mm. However each pin act as a "spring" so I guess it does not require the "legs".
I'll guess I have look at both of these and will make a decision when I know more about the physical space available.
User avatar
akp
XCore Expert
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 11:47 pm

Post by akp »

Hi RitchRock,

Thanks, that's super, and thanks for the tip on JLPCB, will check them out. With the tag-connect at 1.27mm that makes a pretty small surface area used.
RitchRock
XCore Addict
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:25 pm

Post by RitchRock »

jorsc wrote:Thanks for sharing. Looks really interesting.
I also found this https://katalog.we-online.de/em/datashe ... 672012.pdf. Seems like an alternative to Tag-Connect. The Wurth connector is 2.54mm instead of 1.27mm. However each pin act as a "spring" so I guess it does not require the "legs".
I'll guess I have look at both of these and will make a decision when I know more about the physical space available.
Tag Connect uses the spring pins, AKA Pogo pins. The legs are merely for alignment so you have the option to "attach" the connector to the PCB.
Last edited by RitchRock on Fri May 17, 2019 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RitchRock
XCore Addict
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:25 pm

Post by RitchRock »

[quote="jorsc"]Thanks for sharing. Looks really interesting.
I also found this https://katalog.we-online.de/em/datashe ... 672012.pdf. Seems like an alternative to Tag-Connect. The Wurth connector is 2.54mm instead of 1.27mm. However each pin act as a "spring" so I guess it does not require the "legs".
I'll guess I have look at both of these and will make a decision when I know more about the physical space available.[/quote]

Tag Connect uses the spring pins, aka "pogo pins". The Legs merely help with alignment and to "attach" the connector to PCB.