Hello
Just wondering if there would be a big impediment to adding TDM slave functionality to lib_i2s? Just looking at the usage guide and code it seems to me that since i2s slave has been implemented there's probably nothing fundamentally stopping the implementation of TDM slave as well. From skimming the code it looks like the i2s slave simply looks for rising edge of lrclk and then ins/outs ch 0 (L) then ch 1 (R). So extending that for more channels ... e.g. fixed 8 channel shouldn't be that difficult.
Thoughts?
lib_i2s TDM slave
-
akp
- XCore Expert
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 11:47 pm
-
xsamc
- Active Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:38 pm
Hi akp,
I don't believe that there would be :) It should be possible to extend the I2S slave functionality to provide a TDM slave component - I'd suggest starting from the same API and adding an additional parameter to specify the number of channel pairs (which should give you what you need to extend the implementation to support TDM).
Cheers,
Sam
I don't believe that there would be :) It should be possible to extend the I2S slave functionality to provide a TDM slave component - I'd suggest starting from the same API and adding an additional parameter to specify the number of channel pairs (which should give you what you need to extend the implementation to support TDM).
Cheers,
Sam