Whilst getting my head around the port numbering and priorities etc for various chip packages I noticed a numbering oddity :
This is probably a stupid question and I have clearly missed something obvious but why aren't there ports covering the range XnD44 - XnD48?
And or why would it be numbered in that way :?
regards
Al
Missing Ports range XnD44 - XnD48
-
Folknology
- XCore Legend
- Posts: 1274
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm
-
AtomSoft
- XCore Addict
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:02 pm
Seems to just not be implemented yet... maybe they plan to include it in a future release or update...
It says SPARE assuming it means extra pin not needed. Maybe it was easier to route to the other pins so they skipped those heh...
Would be nice for a real answer tho heh
It says SPARE assuming it means extra pin not needed. Maybe it was easier to route to the other pins so they skipped those heh...
Would be nice for a real answer tho heh
-
Folknology
- XCore Legend
- Posts: 1274
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm
And also Xn59..60