Missing Ports range XnD44 - XnD48

Technical discussions around xCORE processors (e.g. xcore-200 & xcore.ai).
User avatar
Folknology
XCore Legend
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Missing Ports range XnD44 - XnD48

Post by Folknology »

Whilst getting my head around the port numbering and priorities etc for various chip packages I noticed a numbering oddity :

This is probably a stupid question and I have clearly missed something obvious but why aren't there ports covering the range XnD44 - XnD48?

And or why would it be numbered in that way :?

regards
Al
User avatar
AtomSoft
XCore Addict
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:02 pm

Post by AtomSoft »

Seems to just not be implemented yet... maybe they plan to include it in a future release or update...

It says SPARE assuming it means extra pin not needed. Maybe it was easier to route to the other pins so they skipped those heh...

Would be nice for a real answer tho heh
User avatar
Folknology
XCore Legend
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Post by Folknology »

And also Xn59..60